> I believe we are in agreement. Some items, like ad-insertion, are > "by agreement" (like I will take ad-insertion in return for having Free DSL). given your choice of example, maybe we are not in agreement. I don't see any way that OPES should be allowed to specify a means by which third parties (like ISPs) can modify packets in transit. That is an abhorrent practice, which IETF should not legitimize. Keith
- RE: opes and technology picks Tony Hain
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Brian E Carpenter
- Re: opes and technology picks Markus Hofmann
- Re: opes and technology picks Brian E Carpenter
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Michael W. Condry
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: opes and technology picks Michael W. Condry
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Michael W. Condry
- Re: opes and technology picks Scott Brim
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Michael W. Condry
- Re: opes and technology picks Eliot Lear
- Re: opes and technology picks Vernon Schryver
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Jim Fleming
- Re: opes and technology picks Vernon Schryver
