I assume you mean change "without permission" as opposed
to "by request".
At 01:44 PM 6/22/2001 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> > I believe we are in agreement. Some items, like ad-insertion, are
> > "by agreement" (like I will take ad-insertion in return for having Free 
> DSL).
>
>given your choice of example, maybe we are not in agreement.
>
>I don't see any way that OPES should be allowed to specify a means by which
>third parties (like ISPs) can modify packets in transit.  That is an
>abhorrent practice, which IETF should not legitimize.
>
>Keith

Michael W. Condry
Director,  Network Edge Technology



Reply via email to