I assume you mean change "without permission" as opposed to "by request". At 01:44 PM 6/22/2001 -0400, Keith Moore wrote: > > I believe we are in agreement. Some items, like ad-insertion, are > > "by agreement" (like I will take ad-insertion in return for having Free > DSL). > >given your choice of example, maybe we are not in agreement. > >I don't see any way that OPES should be allowed to specify a means by which >third parties (like ISPs) can modify packets in transit. That is an >abhorrent practice, which IETF should not legitimize. > >Keith Michael W. Condry Director, Network Edge Technology
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Brian E Carpenter
- Re: opes and technology picks Markus Hofmann
- Re: opes and technology picks Brian E Carpenter
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Michael W. Condry
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: opes and technology picks Michael W. Condry
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Michael W. Condry
- Re: opes and technology picks Scott Brim
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Michael W. Condry
- Re: opes and technology picks Eliot Lear
- Re: opes and technology picks Vernon Schryver
- Re: opes and technology picks Keith Moore
- Re: opes and technology picks Jim Fleming
- Re: opes and technology picks Vernon Schryver
