----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Crocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: networksorcery.com spam
> At 10:07 AM 7/22/2001, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote:
> >clearly 99.9% of spam is worse than the networksorcery
> >stuff. I suggest that stopping the worst of the spam should be higher
> >priority.
>
> an excellent goal. how can we objectively differentiate the one from the
> other?
>
Simply moving away from the IPv4 Sewer works wonders.
The "toy" IPv4 Internet is a sewer.
IPv8 is designed to be a swamp to cover the sewer.
IPv16 is the "high-ground"....
...here are some links...
http://www.dot-arizona.com/IPv8/
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com
Mars 128n 128e
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12213.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12223.html
