----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Ebersman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jim Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 4:54 PM Subject: Re: networksorcery.com spam > > dee3> clearly 99.9% of spam is worse than the networksorcery stuff. I > dee3> suggest that stopping the worst of the spam should be higher > dee3> priority. > > dcrocker> an excellent goal. how can we objectively differentiate the > dcrocker> one from the other? > > Fleming> Simply moving away from the IPv4 Sewer works wonders. > Don't forget....Keep at least one IPv4 address.... http://www.dot-arizona.com/IPv8/IPv4/ Jim Fleming http://www.DOT-Arizona.com http://www.DOT.Arizona
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Marshall T. Rose
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Gary E. Miller
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Marshall T. Rose
- Re: networksorcery.com spam TRAICOVN (NW)
- Re: networksorcery.com sp... Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia
- Re: networksorcery.com sp... John Stracke
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: networksorcery.com sp... Dave Crocker
- Re: networksorcery.co... Jim Fleming
- Re: networksorcery.co... Paul Ebersman
- Re: networksorcery.co... Jim Fleming
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Dave Crocker
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Vernon Schryver
- RE: networksorcery.com spam Christian Huitema
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Vernon Schryver
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Bob Braden
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Jim Fleming
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Vernon Schryver
