dee3> clearly 99.9% of spam is worse than the networksorcery stuff. I dee3> suggest that stopping the worst of the spam should be higher dee3> priority. dcrocker> an excellent goal. how can we objectively differentiate the dcrocker> one from the other? Fleming> Simply moving away from the IPv4 Sewer works wonders. Wrapping aluminum foil around one's head and moving into a packing crate does cut down on the number of telemarketers bothering you, but it doesn't really solve the problem. It just indicates strongly that you're nuts. Next... -- Paul
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Michael Mealling
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Marshall T. Rose
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Gary E. Miller
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Marshall T. Rose
- Re: networksorcery.com spam TRAICOVN (NW)
- Re: networksorcery.com sp... Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia
- Re: networksorcery.com sp... John Stracke
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: networksorcery.com sp... Dave Crocker
- Re: networksorcery.co... Jim Fleming
- Keep on IPv4 address.... Paul Ebersman
- Keep on IPv4 address.... Jim Fleming
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Dave Crocker
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Vernon Schryver
- RE: networksorcery.com spam Christian Huitema
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Vernon Schryver
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Bob Braden
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Jim Fleming
- Re: networksorcery.com spam Vernon Schryver