On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:08:40 EDT, John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  said:
> No, it turns out that what they mean by UNL is an artificial human language, a
> common intermediary that any human text can be translated into; they postulate
> translation servers that know how to translate between UNL and specific human
> languages.  Much higher in the stack than IP.  :-)

Remember that the Babelfish, by allowing perfect communication, was the cause
of more and bloodier wars than anything else ever recorded... ;)

Douglas Adams was right...

-- 
                                Valdis Kletnieks
                                Operating Systems Analyst
                                Virginia Tech

Reply via email to