Hi,
Fred Baker wrote:
>
> At 11:01 PM 4/20/00 +0200, Anders Feder wrote:
> >The translation system being developed for the United Nations, the Universal
> >Network Language (UNL), looks quite promising. Does the IETF have any plans
> >regarding this system?
>
> not specifically. Care to make an argument that we should?
(1)
http://www.unl.ias.unu.edu/publications/gm/breaking/bre/brk-02.htm
states that:
`UNL represents sentences in the form of
logical expressions, without ambiguity.
These expressions are not for humans to
read, but for computers.'
(2)
http://www.unl.ias.unu.edu/publications/gm/unlsys/sys-03.htm
states that:
`it is proposed that the description format for
UNL expression is considered as an extension of HTML convention.'
Hope this helps,
Jean-Paul Jeral
ISIS/RIT/WT
EC JRC Ispra.
