Re: Universal Network Language

[Jon Knight]

On Tue, 23 May 2000, Jean-Paul Jeral wrote:
> (1) 
> http://www.unl.ias.unu.edu/publications/gm/breaking/bre/brk-02.htm
> states that:
> 
>  `UNL represents sentences in the form of 
> logical expressions, without ambiguity.
> These expressions are not for humans to 
> read, but for computers.'

So is this a machine readable version of an Esperanto style human language
or something more like ANDF/UNCOL?

Tatty bye,

Jim'll