correction Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated?

[Keith Moore]

in an earlier message, I wrote:

> OTOH, I don't see why IPv6 will necessarily have significantly more
> levels of assignment delegation.  Even if it needs a few more levels,
> 6 or 7 bits out of 128 total is a lot worse than 4 or 5 bits out of 32.

the last sentence contains a thinko.  it should read:

6 or 7 bits out of 128 total is a lot better than 4 or 5 bits out of 32.

(I originally wrote the comparison in the other order, but when I swapped
sides, forgot to change the direction of the comparison.)

Keith