"Brijesh Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> WAP's goal is not to replace IP, but mediate between non-IP wireless
> devices, and existing IP based wire line applications.
So then obvious the Right Thing is to put an IP stack on each of those
devices. Then such "mediation" is unnecessary.
--
Mark Atwood | It is the hardest thing for intellectuals to understand, that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | just because they haven't thought of something, somebody else
| might. <http://www.friesian.com/rifkin.htm>
http://www.pobox.com/~mra
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Taylor, Johnny
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WA... Keith Moore
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Rejec... Brijesh Kumar
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- R... John Stracke
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- R... Keith Moore
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- R... Mark Atwood
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- R... Steve Deering
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap ... Bill Manning
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A ... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP I... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: W... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A ... John Stracke
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP I... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: W... Masataka Ohta
