From: John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 09:03:12 -0400 > Bill Manning wrote: > > > And the draft on IP over seismic waves is due any day now. > > Security Considerations: since the most effective way to generate seismic > waves is with a nuclear device, users of this protocol can expect to be > secured by their governments for a very long time. This sounds like a protocol which would not run popular in California or else they will communicate themselfs of the US west coast. Also, isn't the long range devices under international non-spread agreements? Some implementations is certainly under strict legal control due to their technology. Will the draft cover the usage of Modified Time Interval Encoding (MTIE)? Cheers, Magnus
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Re... Keith Moore
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Re... Mark Atwood
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Re... Steve Deering
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -... Bill Manning
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... John Stracke
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Masataka Ohta
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... Matt Crawford
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is... Chuck Kaekel
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Brijesh Kumar
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Mahadevan Iyer
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... Bob Wise
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Eric Brunner
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Parkinson, Jonathan
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Lee John-W15376
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Dan Kohn
