> > Bill Manning wrote:
> >
> > > And the draft on IP over seismic waves is due any day now.
> >
> > Security Considerations: since the most effective way to generate seismic
> > waves is with a nuclear device, users of this protocol can expect to be
> > secured by their governments for a very long time.
>
> This sounds like a protocol which would not run popular in California or else
> they will communicate themselfs of the US west coast. Also, isn't the long
> range devices under international non-spread agreements? Some implementations
> is certainly under strict legal control due to their technology.
>
> Will the draft cover the usage of Modified Time Interval Encoding (MTIE)?
The draft should also cover IP over Tsunami.
Masataka Ohta
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Re... Mark Atwood
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Re... Steve Deering
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -... Bill Manning
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... John Stracke
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Masataka Ohta
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... Matt Crawford
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is... Chuck Kaekel
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Brijesh Kumar
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Mahadevan Iyer
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... Bob Wise
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Eric Brunner
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Parkinson, Jonathan
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Lee John-W15376
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Dan Kohn
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Taylor, Johnny
