Probably, there is some universe out there made of AnTi-Matter and where anti-packets are mostly routed using anti-IP, or in other words...ATM. :) On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Brijesh Kumar wrote: > > Chuck writes, > > > It's my understanding that disturbances in The Force > > were actually routed using an ancient precursor to IP. > > > I don't know about it, but the myth goes that ET communicated with his > folks using IP :-). The captured packet trace is > "UndecodableDatalink:IPheader:TCPheader:"ET go home"" > > Cheers, > > --brijesh >
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -... Bill Manning
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... John Stracke
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Masataka Ohta
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... Matt Crawford
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is... Chuck Kaekel
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Brijesh Kumar
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Mahadevan Iyer
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... Bob Wise
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Eric Brunner
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Parkinson, Jonathan
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Lee John-W15376
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Dan Kohn
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Taylor, Johnny
