No, what will happen is one IPv6 prefix per household/car/whatever, and therefore no reason for NAT. Brian "Rakers, Jason" wrote: > > When household appliances begin becoming IP addressable, I think we will see > a move towards assigning an Internet IP address per household (much like > today's street address). The household will perform NAT for all devices > within (one street address can house many people, not just one).
- Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dennis Glatting
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Magnus Danielson
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Harald Alvestrand
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dawson, Peter D
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Rakers, Jason
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Andre-John Mas
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! M�ns Nilsson
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Andre-John Mas
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! R A Lichtensteiger
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Keith Moore
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh m... Steven Cotton
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh m... Steve Deering
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Evstiounin, Mikhail
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Parkinson, Jonathan
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Rakers, Jason
