"Rakers, Jason" wrote: > > When household appliances begin becoming IP addressable, I think we will see > a move towards assigning an Internet IP address per household (much like > today's street address). The household will perform NAT for all devices > within (one street address can house many people, not just one). IMNSHO, NAT is evil. While most end-luser applications work "fine" with it, it does impose restrictions on what can be done as compared to possibilities in the end-to-end universe. *Designing* something to be NAT in a world that goes toward a larger address space is broken and should be avoided att all practical costs. I do sense that this has been discussed before and will now stop. -- M�ns Nilsson DNS Technichian +46 709 174 840 NIC-SE +46 8 545 85 707 MN1334-RIPE
- Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dennis Glatting
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Magnus Danielson
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Harald Alvestrand
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dawson, Peter D
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Rakers, Jason
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Andre-John Mas
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! M�ns Nilsson
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Andre-John Mas
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! R A Lichtensteiger
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Keith Moore
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh m... Steven Cotton
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh m... Steve Deering
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Evstiounin, Mikhail
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Parkinson, Jonathan
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Rakers, Jason
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Brian E Carpenter
