John;
> Renfield Kuroda wrote:
>
> > James Seng wrote:
> >
> > > Not sure if it is relevant but i-mode is working on an end-to-end IP
> > > system now which will be deploy sometime next year.
> >
> > Really?
No.
> The guy from NTT Docomo who spoke at Adelaide mentioned it. I don't remember
> details, though.
The detail you wrote in IETF ML on:
Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 14:30:54 -0400
in
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
is
: Didn't someone from DOCOMO present in Adelaide, and say they were
: planning to go to running IP in the handsets?
That's all.
I guess you don't understand the phrase "end-to-end", the essence of
the Internet.
Masataka Ohta
- imode far superior to wap James P. Salsman
- Re: imode far superior to wap M�ns Nilsson
- Re: imode far superior to wap Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: imode far superior to wap Dave Crocker
- end-to-end w/i-Mode? (was Re: imode far superi... James P. Salsman
- Re: imode far superior to wap James Seng
- Re: imode far superior to wap Renfield Kuroda
- Re: imode far superior to wap John Stracke
- Re: imode far superior to wap Masataka Ohta
- Re: imode far superior to wap John Stracke
- Re: imode far superior to wap Steven Cotton
- Re: imode far superior to wap Francis Dupont
- Re: imode far superior to wap Masataka Ohta
- Re: imode far superior to wap Masataka Ohta
- Re: imode far superior to wap M�ns Nilsson
- Re: imode far superior to wap Masataka Ohta
- Re: imode far superior to wap James P. Salsman
- RE: imode far superior to wap Brijesh Kumar
- RE: imode far superior to wap John Day
