Masataka Ohta wrote: > > Nilsson; > > > I doubt that you will find support from IETF folks for something that > > breaks the end-to-end model of IP (as Imode and WAP do as they are > > implemented today). I want to be able to ssh to my phone (or > > equivalent). Anything below that is just telephantisms. > > I'm afraid that ssh for phone is just another telephantisms. :-) Compared to your much healthier view, yes. I do agree that it is very interesting. I was perhaps thinking the same but failed to express; the hand terminal is going to be a computing device with voice capability rather than a phone with datacom kludges. Then it is immediately obvious why one wants to make a VT-style terminal connection to it. :-) (ie SSH) -- M�ns Nilsson DNS Technichian +46 709 174 840 NIC-SE +46 8 545 85 707 MN1334-RIPE
- end-to-end w/i-Mode? (was Re: imode far supe... James P. Salsman
- Re: imode far superior to wap James Seng
- Re: imode far superior to wap Renfield Kuroda
- Re: imode far superior to wap John Stracke
- Re: imode far superior to wap Masataka Ohta
- Re: imode far superior to w... John Stracke
- Re: imode far superior to wap Steven Cotton
- Re: imode far superior to wap Francis Dupont
- Re: imode far superior to wap Masataka Ohta
- Re: imode far superior to wap Masataka Ohta
- Re: imode far superior to wap M�ns Nilsson
- Re: imode far superior to wap Masataka Ohta
- Re: imode far superior to wap James P. Salsman
- RE: imode far superior to wap Brijesh Kumar
- RE: imode far superior to wap John Day
- Re: imode far superior to wap George Michaelson
- RE: imode far superior to wap Shaw, Robert
- RE: imode far superior to wap Barathy, RamaSubramaniam
- RE: imode far superior to wap Steven Cotton
- RE: imode far superior to wap vinton g. cerf
- Re: imode far superior to wap James P. Salsman
