On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:33:43 EDT, "Corzine, Gordie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Wouldn't it be better by far, to assign new addresses from 000...1, and map
> to routing information however we may code it? The memory and processor
> steps required would be trivial compared to the agony of running out of
> space again.
Congrats, you just re-invented ARP. ;)
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
- Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Corzine, Gordie
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Salavat R. Magazov
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Matt Crawford
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Fred Baker
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Keith Moore
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Steven M. Bellovin
PGP signature