> Does this mean that every router will have to handle 2^48 routing table > entries and that this vast amount of information must be sent over the > internet on every routing table update? > Salavat In a word, no. In two words, Hell no! See RFC 2374.
- Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Corzine, Gordie
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Salavat R. Magazov
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Matt Crawford
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Fred Baker
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Keith Moore
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Vijay Gill
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Salavat R. Magazov
