Brian Carpenter writes: > This is some sort of urban legend. If a routeable > prefix was given to every human, using a predicted > world population of 11 billion, we would > consume about 0.004% of the total IPv6 address > space. Surely you recall the quotation attributed to Thomas J. Watson: "The world will never need more than five computers."
- Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Corzine, Gordie
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Salavat R. Magazov
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Matt Crawford
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Fred Baker
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Keith Moore
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Anthony Atkielski
