Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > > The problem is that we (as a profession) don't know > > how to do that. We have to make routing scale, and > > that demands aggregation, which in turn demands > > structured addresses. > > The telephone company figured out how to avoid problems decades ago. Why > the computer industry has to rediscover things the hard way mystifies me. The telephone company has milliseconds to seconds to resolve an address into a route. The Internet has microseconds to nanoseconds to do so.
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Salavat R. Magazov
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Matt Crawford
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Fred Baker
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Keith Moore
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Vijay Gill
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Salavat R. Magazov
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Geoff Huston
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Bill Manning
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Corzine, Gordie
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... John Kristoff
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Anthony Atkielski
