Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers

[Masataka Ohta]

Thomas;

> The
> other changes/benefits (simplified autoconfiguration, improved
> mobility, tools to help with renumbering, etc.) while important, are
> secondary.

Huh? Compared to IPv4 equivalent, all the three features of IPv6
are unnecessarily complex without necessary functionalities.

> > IPv6 is only rationally justified as a modest but necessary
> > enhancement to IPv4,
> 
> I agree with this, and suspect that much of the core IPv6 community
> does as well.

That's a silly statement.

Committees add all the features considered by some a modest but
necessary enhancement, of course.

                                                        Masataka Ohta