Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers

[Brian E Carpenter]

Masataka Ohta wrote:
> 
> Thomas;
> 
> > The
> > other changes/benefits (simplified autoconfiguration, improved
> > mobility, tools to help with renumbering, etc.) while important, are
> > secondary.
> 
> Huh? Compared to IPv4 equivalent, all the three features of IPv6
> are unnecessarily complex without necessary functionalities.

This is your opinion, not a statement of fact.
> 
> > > IPv6 is only rationally justified as a modest but necessary
> > > enhancement to IPv4,
> >
> > I agree with this, and suspect that much of the core IPv6 community
> > does as well.
> 
> That's a silly statement.

No it isn't.

   Brian