*> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 28 13:06:31 2000
*> From: "Eliot Lear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*> To: "John C Klensin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "\"Mike O'Dell\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<3744053340.970111694@P2>
*> Subject: Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference material
*> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 12:02:04 -0700
*> Organization: Cisco Systems
*> MIME-Version: 1.0
*> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
*> X-Priority: 3
*> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
*> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
*> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
*> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
*> X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
*> X-Lines: 11
*>
*> John,
*>
*> I would accept your interpretation if you can go to a major search engine,
*> like Yahoo or Altavista, and find me in a brief period of time ANY version
*> of Mike O'Dell's 8+8 proposal. Don't you think it shameful that there is
*> no permanent record about a serious effort to deal with a serious problem
*> (multihoming)? And this is a recent (read: current) problem!
It is indeed shameful. One wonders why it was not published at an
Informational RFC. (It's not too late...)
Bob Braden
*>
*> Eliot
*>
*>
*>
