Eric Brunner-Williams wrote: > > > And what WG? Internet Drafts were and are generated by Individuals w/o > > benefit of an associated WG. > > Precisely my point to Grenville. Our discussion had nothing to do with who the question of who *generates* I-Ds, but what makes them valid on an ongoing basis. gja
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Eliot Lear
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Mike O'Dell
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Bill Manning
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Bill Manning
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Hal Murray
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Keith Moore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Bill Manning
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Mohsen BANAN-Public
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Grenville Armitage
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Bill Manning
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Grenville Armitage
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Melinda Shore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Robert Elz
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... vint cerf
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Melinda Shore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... vint cerf
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Russ Allbery
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... vint cerf
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Robert Elz
