% Eric Brunner-Williams wrote: % > % > > And what WG? Internet Drafts were and are generated by Individuals w/o % > > benefit of an associated WG. % > % > Precisely my point to Grenville. % % Our discussion had nothing to do with who the question of who % *generates* I-Ds, but what makes them valid on an ongoing basis. % % gja A key point about validity is the agreement btwn author(s) and the IETF. Once the timer expires, the ID is not valid, as an ID. The IETF has lost its chance to "capture" the information in the IETF process. IMHO, this includes such IETF structures as WG, IESG, ADs, IAB, Secretary, et.al. The information reverts to the author(s). --bill
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Mike O'Dell
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Bill Manning
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Bill Manning
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Hal Murray
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Keith Moore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Bill Manning
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Mohsen BANAN-Public
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Grenville Armitage
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Bill Manning
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Grenville Armitage
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Melinda Shore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Robert Elz
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... vint cerf
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Melinda Shore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... vint cerf
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Russ Allbery
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... vint cerf
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft ... Robert Elz
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as re... Bob Braden
