In the present regime, its not surprising the frist below does not resolve and the second does: http://www.d�j�.fr/ http://www.deja.fr/ In the proposed regime, its not obvious what to do from a purely consumer point of view. Verisigns view would be each is completely unique. ICANN's dispute resolution would say there completely identifical and one has to go! But ICANN's resolution makes this problem appear in the first place. Whoops, its not pretty. Dan K
- Re: Example of dns (non) fun Dan Kolis
- Re: Example of dns (non) fun Rick H Wesson
- Re: Example of dns (non) fun Karl Auerbach
- Re: Example of dns (non) fun John C Klensin
- Re: Example of dns (non) fun Richard Shockey
- Re: Example of dns (non) fun vint cerf
- Re: Example of dns (non) fun Stephen Dyer
