from a purely mechanical point of view, if the character encoding
of these two strings makes them distinct, one might have to treat
them as distinct registrations - unless a very mechanical means of
converting them both into some canonical form were available to
make them "match" - one would imagine that such canonicalization
process might require language-specific knowledge and that sounds
pretty challenging.
Vint
At 07:09 PM 12/4/2000 -0500, Richard Shockey wrote:
>At 05:00 PM 12/4/2000 -0500, Dan Kolis wrote:
>>In the present regime, its not surprising the frist below does not resolve
>>and the second does:
>>
>>http://www.d�j�.fr/
>>http://www.deja.fr/
>>
>>
>>In the proposed regime, its not obvious what to do from a purely consumer
>>point of view.
>
>Depends on who is the consumer... to the French the difference here is completely
>obvious... and this whole problem is just "another Anglo-Saxon plot" etc...
>
>
>>Verisigns view would be each is completely unique. ICANN's
>>dispute resolution would say there completely identifical and one has to go!
>>But ICANN's resolution makes this problem appear in the first place.
>
>
>
