At 05:00 PM 12/4/2000 -0500, Dan Kolis wrote:
>In the present regime, its not surprising the frist below does not resolve
>and the second does:
>
>http://www.d�j�.fr/
>http://www.deja.fr/
>
>
>In the proposed regime, its not obvious what to do from a purely consumer
>point of view.

Depends on who is the consumer... to the French the difference here is 
completely obvious... and this whole problem is just "another Anglo-Saxon 
plot" etc...


>Verisigns view would be each is completely unique. ICANN's
>dispute resolution would say there completely identifical and one has to go!
>But ICANN's resolution makes this problem appear in the first place.




Reply via email to