Keith;
> > > you missed it. Suppose you could not exchange in commerce with a person of
> > > a given nationality, not because you did not have a language in common with
> > > him or her, but because your system could not interpret his or her name.
> > > That would mean that you could not spend money in that person's direction,
> > > because you could not communicate with him or her.
> >
> > And it means that person is at a disadvantage in your marketspace, and
> > that it's not your problem.
>
> why in the world do people think they can justify or not justify actions
> based on whether something is an advantage/disadvantage in some
> "marketspace"?
They can justify them locally within local marketspaces, of course.
However, they can't justify to call them internationalization.
Masataka Ohta
