Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote: > Ed, why do you insist on advertising your patent-pending voting > solution on the IETF mailing list? It does not involve any IETF > protocol work, does it? ;-) SMTP, HTML, TLS, PGP, and others, including TCP/IP. Pls do not be so bent out of shape by the word "patent". I think we have a fair proposal for it, which we call FREE patent, and is much the same as FREE software. However, I respect your disagreement. Hope we can meet some day. Cheers, Ed Gerck
- internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc. James P. Salsman
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, et... Stephen Sprunk
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, et... Ed Gerck
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, et... Ed Gerck
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, et... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- IVTA, Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiativ... Ed Gerck
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, et... Kai Henningsen
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, et... Ed Gerck
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, et... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, et... Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, et... Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, et... Vernon Schryver
