On Thu, 2001.02.01, Hilarie Orman wrote: > Dave Cheriton's TRIAD is an example of such a proposal. > > Hilarie > > >>> Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/01/01 11:05AM >>> > At 03:05 PM 1/31/2001 -0800, Ed Gerck wrote: > >You miss at least one other possibility. If it is possible to develop > >an addressing scheme that works in a heterogeneous network, then > >we can have point-to-point functionality across system borders and > >do not require a homogeneous address space to do so. Nimrod, not Triad - fails heterogeneity. -p.
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables David T. Perkins
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Ed Gerck
- head hurting [was Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverabl... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Dave Crocker
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Michael Richardson
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Greg Minshall
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Hilarie Orman
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables V Guruprasad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Greg Minshall
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Michael W. Condry
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables David R. Conrad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables David R. Conrad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Eliot Lear
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables V Guruprasad
