Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

[David R. Conrad]

At 05:53 PM 2/14/2001 -0800, Michael W. Condry wrote:
>I assume with IPv6 there is no need for NATs.

IPv6 does not solve the need to renumber if you change providers (and no, 
not everyone can be a provider -- IPv6 uses CIDR, just like IPv4).  Until 
that issue is addressed, there will be NATs.  Even for v6.

Rgds,
-drc