Vernon Schryver wrote:
[..]
> Besides, mailing list traffic tends to be
> "white listed" and so bypass individual spam filters.
Which is why some of us would encourage the use of
techniques that make mailing lists less attractive
to opportunistic spammers.
I feel dizzy.
cheers,
gja
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs ned . freed
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Christian Huitema
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Tony Hain
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Maurizio Codogno
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs John Stracke
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs stanislav shalunov
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Christian Huitema
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Vernon Schryver
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Eric Rosen
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Maurizio Codogno
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Vernon Schryver
- focus Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Mak, L (Leen)
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs James M Galvin
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Matt Holdrege
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs James M Galvin
