In die Tue, 22 May 2001 20:49:51 -0400 Eric Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scripsit: > I do this for the mailing list of the MPLS working group, so I'm aware of > what a nuisance it is. But as far as mailing list management goes, it's not > nearly as big a nuisance as trying to figure out which of the error messages > to owner-mpls are bogus and which are real. (The mailing list has 3000 > members and each message to it results in 100 error messages.) mailman seems to have an automated way to put subscribers whose email bounces out of the list, but I must confess I prefer to look at the errors and decide case per case. Luckily, my lists have at most 400 users. ciao, .mau.
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Christian Huitema
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Tony Hain
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Maurizio Codogno
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs John Stracke
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs stanislav shalunov
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Christian Huitema
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Vernon Schryver
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Eric Rosen
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Maurizio Codogno
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Vernon Schryver
- focus Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Mak, L (Leen)
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs James M Galvin
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Matt Holdrege
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs James M Galvin
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore