Maurizio> but this means Maurizio> - that there is a person who has the right to decide whether the Maurizio> message is spam or not Maurizio> - that this person is willing to bear the burden for the sake of the Maurizio> whole community. Maurizio> I happen to do this for some lists, but it's a nuisance, I may Maurizio> assure you. I do this for the mailing list of the MPLS working group, so I'm aware of what a nuisance it is. But as far as mailing list management goes, it's not nearly as big a nuisance as trying to figure out which of the error messages to owner-mpls are bogus and which are real. (The mailing list has 3000 members and each message to it results in 100 error messages.) It's not hard to decide whether a particular message is unsolicited commercial email or not, that's not something that people disagree about.
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Christian Huitema
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Tony Hain
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Maurizio Codogno
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs John Stracke
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs stanislav shalunov
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Christian Huitema
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Vernon Schryver
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Eric Rosen
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Maurizio Codogno
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Vernon Schryver
- focus Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Mak, L (Leen)
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs James M Galvin
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Matt Holdrege
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs James M Galvin
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore