On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 04:42:45PM -0500, John Klensin wrote: > * Should we continue with the two-plenary model? Should we do > so at every IETF, or consider some sort of periodic or > occasional schedule?
Please continue. Do so at every IETF modulo demand. > * If so, should we continue with IESG on Wednesday and IAB on > Thursday, or should we alternate them (or adopt some more > radical schedule change -- probably too late for Minneapolis at > this point). It depends why people couldn't come on Thursday night. For the great majority: now they know better. Keep it the way it is now, and stay consistent. > * Do you have major architectural themes that should be > addressed during the next IAB plenary if one is held? (See later mail) > * And should the IAB try to control microphone time, or is it > better to let people explain their views at whatever length that > takes? Some. Keep a balance. It depends on the substance etc., as usual. ..Scott
