John Klensin wrote: > * Should we continue with the two-plenary model? Should we do > so at every IETF, or consider some sort of periodic or > occasional schedule?
Yes, but move the Social to Sunday after the Reception so the IAB slot can be done Tuesday. > * If so, should we continue with IESG on Wednesday and IAB on > Thursday, or should we alternate them (or adopt some more > radical schedule change -- probably too late for Minneapolis at > this point). (see above) > * Do you have major architectural themes that should be > addressed during the next IAB plenary if one is held? The conflict between end-to-end data integrity and middle-boxes that insist on rewriting content. > * And should the IAB try to control microphone time, or is it > better to let people explain their views at whatever length that > takes? While it shouldn't be necessary if people would make their points succinctly, if the mic time is not controlled some people will just get frustrated and leave without their opinions being heard. Tony
