On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:34:10 EST, Eric Rosen said: > Naturally every special interest group claims to be the defender of the > values of the larger community. Since there is no way to determine > objectively what is or is not in the "larger community's" interest, a > properly functioning IESG would not try to impose a particular vision, but > would just work to ensure that the output of the WGs is of suitable > technical quality. (Of course, every attempt to impose by fiat a particular > vision of the future is portrayed as an attempt to ensure technical > quality.)
And attempts at ensuring technical quality by quashing competent implementations of stupid ideas is seen as "imposing by fiat"? ;) Remember that just because something seems to be a good idea in the WG does not mean that it's a good idea overall. Forest for the trees.....
msg09765/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
