> I already indicated before: 100-150 Euros more is not a big issue. I strongly and emphatically disagree, and I strongly object to attempts to use of increased meeting feeds to discourage some parties from participating at IETF. Basically this kind of fee increase is completely and absolutely unacceptable.
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: IETF58 - Network Status Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Keith Moore
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Roland Bless
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Scott W Brim
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Keith Moore
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Joel Jaeggli
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Daniel Senie
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Chirayu Patel
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Dean Anderson
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Randall Gellens
