The FSF copntinues to attempt to re-open this decision. I don't see any infomation content to these posts, beyond the already known facts that 1) RMS has people read his Web site and 2) perpetrates a one-way form of communication - we have to listen to him but he has no intention of listening to us. I suggest that we consider a mechanism for sending any message that is CC'd to [EMAIL PROTECTED] straight to the bit bucket. The fact that it is multiple individuals responding to an obsolete campaign page rather than one noise maker does not make it any less disruptive.
________________________________ From: Richard Wilbur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 22/10/2007 6:42 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TLS-authz "experimental" standard To those considering the TLS-authz proposal: The patent shenanigans of RedPhone Security have reduced implementation status from "open" to "taxed at the whim of RedPhone Security." This should be enough to disqualify the proposal from further consideration unless, and until, RedPhone Security grants a royalty-free license for all users. The imprimatur of the IETF should remain reserved for open standards. Thank you for considering my position. Sincerely, Richard Wilbur Senior Software Developer Server Software _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
