>>>>> "Hallam-Baker," == Hallam-Baker, Phillip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

    Hallam-Baker,> The FSF copntinues to attempt to re-open this
    Hallam-Baker,> decision.

Phil, I think the important point here can be made in a much more
neutral manner.  The last call period is closed.  Additional
discussion until Tim makes a decision is not productive and has for
this document risen to a point where it is disruptive.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to