Simon Josefsson wrote: >> *KICK* ;-) Posted yesterday:
> Hm, how does those rules meet any of the requirements Noel had? Hardly, but now is a good time to discuss the proposed rules, where they don't do what folks consider as required. I think there are enough "interesting" details in the "incoming" I-D that adding missing rules about "anon contributors" would be overkill. Frank _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
