Ross, On 10/26/10 6:32 PM, Ross Callon wrote: > The downside of Russ's draft is that it is possible that after approving it > we might find that nothing changes: Protocol specifications still stay at > Proposed Standard; The IESG still takes a lot of time in approving a request > to publish a proposed standard RFC. How will we measure effect? And what other factors need to be controlled?
(he says, recognizing we are not in an isolated lab) Eliot _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
