On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > I'm a fan of reducing down to 2 levels, too. But it has nothing to do with > how > overblown the effort to get to Proposed is. (Well, there's some pretty > simple > psych logic that says that it could actually make the barrier to Proposed > HIGHER! After all, fewer steps means that each step is more valuable.) >
I'm not sure it's technically possible for it to take longer to produce a PS in the IETF. You'd have to invent some sort of time distortion device, or send the docs on trains to Maastricht. ;) But I agree with you (and Scott et al) on the general point that reducing 3 to 2 doesn't solve a problem anyone has. For example, I don't think being at only PS has prevented anyone from deploying HTTP or the myriad of other protocols at PS level. At this point, going above PS is for masochists. -hadriel _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
