Actually, my heartache with Russ' proposal is the automatic "If it's Draft, it's now Standard."
I would be quite happy with Proposed and Internet Standard, with NO grandfathering. On Oct 26, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Ofer Inbar wrote: > On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: >> I'm a fan of reducing down to 2 levels, too. But it has nothing to >> do with how overblown the effort to get to Proposed is. (Well, > > I feel like we already have a 2-level system. > > What's the practical difference between Proposed and full Standard? > > It may take a lot of effort to make that jump, but what difference > does it make outside of the fact that the document now has a new > label? Who notices or cares about the distinction? Does it affect > anything real? > > These aren't rhetorical questions. I feel like there's no practical > effect, but I may be wrong, and I'm asking. > -- Cos > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
