In message <22f6318e46e26b498abc828879b08d4f1d2...@tk5ex14mbxw651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>, Christian Huitema writes : > > After some discussion, the IESG is attempting to determine whether there is > > IETF consensus to do the following: > > > > - add a new section to draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic > > - publish draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic as INFORMATIONAL > > > > draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic will obsolete RFCs 3056 and 3068 and > > convert their status to HISTORIC. It will also contain > > a new section describing what it means for RFCs 3056 and 3068 to be > classified as HISTORIC. The new section will say that: > > I do not think this is a good idea, and I am certainly not part of the > "consensus."
Seconded. > -- Christian Huitema > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
