Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?

Thomas Nadeau Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:08:05 -0700



On Jul 27, 2011, at 7:31 AM, Mark Townsley <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On Jul 27, 2011, at 7:09 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jul 26, 2011, at 6:49 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> 
>>> Since 6to4 is a transition mechanism it has no long term future *by 
>>> definition*. Even if someone chooses to design a v2, who is going to 
>>> implement it?
>> 
>> Actually, I think one could argue pretty effectively that 6rd is 6to4-bis. 
> 
> +1
> 
> - Mark

+2


> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?

Reply via email to