On Jul 27, 2011 4:32 AM, "Mark Townsley" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jul 27, 2011, at 7:09 AM, Fred Baker wrote: > > > > > On Jul 26, 2011, at 6:49 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > > >> Since 6to4 is a transition mechanism it has no long term future *by definition*. Even if someone chooses to design a v2, who is going to implement it? > > > > Actually, I think one could argue pretty effectively that 6rd is 6to4-bis. > > +1 >
+1 as well as 6in4 or native v6. The full requirements of 6to4 are based on currently unrealistic requirements for no-nat (apnic is post exhaust ) and service providers to stand up relays without a reasonable business case > - Mark > > > _______________________________________________ > > v6ops mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
