On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Eric Burger <[email protected]>wrote:
> +$1.00 > > Have we ever had a BOF that looked under-attended? Not me: always standing > room only! > > I would also argue that you want "BOF tourists." They might turn into participants. They also might point out things like overlap with previous work in the IETF or some other SDO. Regards Marshall > Big rooms = good BOF. > > On Jul 28, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > > On 7/28/11 4:06 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > > >> When we ask for a BoF room, we need to give an indication of estimated > >> attendance. Sometimes it’s hard to make a good guess and so we > >> underestimate, intending to keep larger rooms available for groups that > >> need them. > > > > I think the BoF chairs and responsible ADs need to request larger rooms > > for BoFs. After the REPUTE BOF, I talked with the Secretariat > > (specifically Wanda Lo, who does an amazing job with the schedule!) > > about poking the chairs and ADs when they request BoF rooms to make sure > > that we don't assign small rooms to BoFs, at least without careful > > consideration. > > > > Peter > > > > -- > > Peter Saint-Andre > > https://stpeter.im/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ietf mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
